Explain how a decrease in supply of a product would lead to a new market equilibrium.
Answers may include:
Definitions
- Supply: The quantity of a product that producers are willing and able to sell at a given price over a certain period of time.
- Market Equilibrium: The point where the quantity demanded by consumers equals the quantity supplied by producers, resulting in no tendency for the price to change.
- Equilibrium Price: The price at which the quantity of a product demanded by consumers equals the quantity supplied by producers.
Diagram
- Supply and Demand Diagram:
- The diagram should include:
- Initial supply curve (S1) and new supply curve (S2).
- Demand curve (D).
- Initial equilibrium point (E1) at price (P1) and quantity (Q1).
- New equilibrium point (E2) at price (P2) and quantity (Q2).
- The diagram should clearly show the leftward shift of the supply curve and the resulting changes in equilibrium price and quantity.
- The diagram should include:
Explanation
- Initial Equilibrium:
- Begin with the market in equilibrium where the initial supply curve (S1) intersects the demand curve (D) at equilibrium price (P1) and quantity (Q1).
- Decrease in Supply:
- A decrease in supply shifts the supply curve leftward from S1 to S2.
- This shift could be due to factors such as increased production costs, natural disasters, or regulatory changes.
- New Equilibrium:
- The leftward shift in the supply curve creates a temporary shortage at the original price (P1), as quantity demanded (Q1) exceeds quantity supplied (Q2).
- To eliminate the shortage, the price rises to a new equilibrium price (P2), where the new supply curve (S2) intersects the demand curve (D).
- The new equilibrium quantity (Q2) is lower than the original equilibrium quantity (Q1).
- Market Adjustment:
- As the price increases, the quantity demanded decreases (movement along the demand curve), and the quantity supplied increases until the new equilibrium is reached.
Using real-world examples, evaluate indirect taxations as a measure to reduce the consumption of demerit goods.
Answers may include
Definitions
- Indirect Taxation: Taxes levied on spending on goods and services. They are called indirect because while consumers contribute to part or all of the tax, it is the suppliers (firms) who collect and transfer these taxes to the government authorities (consumers pay the taxes indirectly).
- Demerit Goods: Goods that are not socially desirable but are over provided by the market.
- Negative Externalities: Costs suffered by a third party as a result of an economic transaction.
Diagram
- Supply and Demand Diagram with Indirect Tax:
- The diagram should show the supply curve shifting leftward/upward due to the imposition of an indirect tax.
- It should indicate the initial equilibrium price and quantity, the new equilibrium after the tax, and the area representing tax revenue.
- The diagram should also highlight the reduction in quantity consumed and the increase in price paid by consumers.
Economic Theory
- Introduction:
- Indirect taxes are commonly used by governments to reduce the consumption of demerit goods by increasing their prices.
- This measure aims to internalize the negative externalities associated with demerit goods.
- Price Mechanism:
- Indirect taxes increase the cost of production, shifting the supply curve leftward.
- This results in a higher market price and a lower quantity consumed, as shown in the diagram.
- Elasticity Considerations:
- The effectiveness of the tax depends on the price elasticity of demand for the demerit good.
- If demand is inelastic, the reduction in consumption may be minimal, but tax revenue will be higher.
- If demand is elastic, a significant reduction in consumption can be achieved.
Evaluation (SLAP)
-
Stakeholders:
-
Consumers: Higher prices due to taxation reduce affordability, leading to lower consumption. However, if demand for the good is inelastic (e.g., cigarettes), the reduction may be minimal.
-
Producers: Face lower demand, potentially reducing revenue and profit. Some firms may shift costs to consumers or invest in alternative products.
-
Government: Gains tax revenue, which can be allocated to public services (e.g., healthcare for smoking-related diseases). However, excessive taxation may encourage black markets.
-
Workers: If firms experience reduced demand, they may cut jobs, particularly in industries like alcohol and tobacco production.
-
Society: Potential benefits from reduced negative externalities (e.g., lower healthcare costs), but concerns arise if taxation disproportionately affects low-income groups.
-
Real-world example: The UK’s sugar tax on soft drinks led to reformulation rather than significant drops in consumption, benefiting public health.
-
Long-run vs. Short-run:
-
Short-run: Consumption may not significantly decrease if demand is inelastic, as seen in cigarette taxation. Consumers may continue buying despite higher prices.
-
Long-run: Higher prices and awareness may change consumption patterns, leading to healthier choices (e.g., Mexico’s soda tax resulted in a 12% decline in sales within two years). However, black markets may develop, and government revenue could decline if consumption falls too much.
-
Real-world example: France’s cigarette taxation saw an initial drop in smoking rates, but long-term effectiveness depended on continuous price increases and public awareness campaigns.
-
Advantages vs. Disadvantages:
-
Advantages:
- Reduces consumption of demerit goods, addressing negative externalities.
- Increases government revenue, which can fund public services.
- Encourages firms to innovate or reformulate (e.g., sugar tax leading to reduced sugar content in soft drinks).
-
Disadvantages:
- May disproportionately affect lower-income consumers (regressive tax).
- Black markets may emerge, leading to lost government revenue.
- Inelastic demand for certain goods (e.g., alcohol, tobacco) limits effectiveness.
-
Prioritize:
-
Effectiveness depends on price elasticity: Goods with more elastic demand (e.g., sugary drinks) respond better to taxation than inelastic goods (e.g., cigarettes, alcohol).
-
Best used with complementary policies: Public awareness campaigns, subsidies for healthier alternatives, and regulations can enhance the effectiveness of taxation.
-
Balance between taxation and enforcement: Excessively high taxes may lead to smuggling and tax evasion (e.g., high cigarette taxes in New York increased illegal sales)
Conclusion
- Indirect taxation is a useful tool for reducing the consumption of demerit goods, but its effectiveness depends on various factors, including demand elasticity and the presence of complementary policies.
- Policymakers must consider the broader economic and social impacts when implementing such taxes.